Construction of Rule F of the York Antwerp Rues (the Longchamp): Judgment of the Supreme Court of 25 October 2017 regarding the question which costs incurred in the period that ship-owners were negotiating with pirates about the release of their hijacked vessel are recoverable as general average under the York Antwerp Rules. This publication was […]
On 28 September 2017 Nigel Margetson spoke about contracting in offshore wind transport and logistics. Nigel’s talk formed part of the DOB Academy’s two day course about offshore wind transport and logistics. DOB is an academy that offers offshore energy education for professionals. Nigel’s presentation can be downloaded from the below hyperlink: 170929 Presentation DOB-version […]
Nick and Nigel Margetson updated their publication on arbitration procedures and practice in the Netherlands overview paper for Thomson Reuters. The original online publication can be viewed here. A PDF copy of the publication can be downloaded here. For more information about our international arbitration capabilities see our international arbitration page. and our offshore energy page.
On 31 August 2017 Nigel Margetson (MVTZ), Nico de Wit (Intramar) and Perry Schot (F3O Offshore) organized a seminar in Flushing. Nico discussed insurance aspects of the Supplytime 2017 and Nigel discussed some main changes in the Supplytime 2017 form as compared to the Supplytime 2005. A copy of Nigel Margetson’s powerpoint presentation can be […]
On 6 December 2016 the Criminal Division of the Dutch Supreme Court Rendered a JUDGEMENT in a piracy / sea robbery case. In the morning of 24 October 2012 – as a participant of the anti-piracy missions ‘Atalanta’ and ‘Ocean Shield’ – the Dutch navy vessel Zr. Ms. ROTTERDAM (a Landing Platform Dock amphibious […]
Nick and Nigel Margetson wrote the arbitration procedures and practice in the Netherlands overview paper for Thomson Reuters. The original online publication can be viewed here. A PDF copy of the publication can be downloaded here. For more information about our international arbitration capabilities see our international arbitration page. and our offshore energy page.
Romania has multiple deposits of deep-sea offshore gas resources with great potential that are in the preliminary stages of being developed. The emerging offshore gas industry in Romania represents major opportunities for business in the upstream, midstream and downstream oil and gas sectors. Opportunities include: Onshore: – The construction of pipelines and other related service; […]
Incorporation of the Netherlands Commercial Court (NCC) Plans have been completed to incorporate a Netherlands Commercial Court (NCC). The intention is that the NCC will commence its work on 1 January 2017, although this date is subject to the passing of a new law. The NCC will deal with large (international) disputes and will be […]
The Supreme Court of the Netherlands confirms the judgments of the court of first instance and the court of appeal regarding the meaning of the expression “en route” in Marpol Annex II
Dr. N.J. Margetson, partner at Margetson Van ‘t Zelfde & Co. Under Marpol Annex II noxious liquid substances may be discharged as long as the discharge is in accordance with Regulation 220.127.116.11(1) which provides as one of the conditions for discharge that: “the ship is proceeding en route at a speed of at least 7 […]
Arnold v Britton and others  UKSC 36 – construction of contracts under English law Judgment of the Supreme Court of 10 June 2015 in the case between Arnold as respondent and Britton and others as appellants. Before: Lord Neuberger, President Lord Sumption Lord Carnwath (dissenting) Lord Hughes Lord Hodge Summary The Supreme Court repeats […]
CBC Oil and Gas (“CBC”), Margetson Van ‘t Zelfde & Co (“MvtZ”) and Philip Sidney have teamed up to offer a full service solution to contractors and oil companies who intend to enter the Iranian oil and gas market Easing of sanctions: Due to the easing of sanctions it is expected that as of the […]
On this page you can download the presentation “Negotiating lump sum contracts in challenging jurisdictions”. The presentation was part of the “Risks and rewards in challenging jurisdictions” seminar at the Offshore Energy 2015 conference in Amsterdam on 14 October 2015. Download the publication at the below link: 151017 Negotiating lump sum contracts in challenging […]
The Kingdom of The Netherlands v Owners of the yacht Qubio – “The Qubio” Supreme Court of the Netherlands : Vice-President F.B. Bakels as chairman and judges G. Snijders, G. de Groot, M.V. Polak and T.H. Tanja-van den Broek 10 July 2015, Case no. ECLI:NL:HR:2015:1836 Full case published on http://uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl/inziendocument?id=ECLI:NL:HR:2015:1836&keyword=ecli%3anl%3ahr%3a2015%3a1836 M.W. Scheltema for The Kingdom […]
Paying bribes, “facilitation” payments or so called “consultancy fees” to win contracts or to facilitate project execution is a criminal offence in many jurisdictions that is penalised with jail sentences and large fines. The UK Bribery Act 2010, the OECD Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials (as implemented in the various OECD countries) […]
In the PDF file which can be downloaded here below I write about the right to conduct a survey in the case of a cargo claim. Download the document here.
This note concerns an arbitration under Dutch law between seventeen cargo claimants domiciled outside the Netherlands and two ship owners, one of whom was domiciled in the Netherlands. Failing a choice of language for the arbitration proceedings, a dispute arose between the contesting parties regarding the language of the arbitration. The claimants argued that the […]
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE, QUEEN’S BENCH DIVISION, TECHNOLOGY AND CONSTRUCTION COURT  EWHC 3201 (TCC) Before : MR. JUSTICE EDWARDS-STUART Between: Doosan Babcock Limited as Claimant (“Doosan”) Counsel: Steven Walker Esq, QC & Miss Serena Cheng and Comercializadora de Equipos y Materiales Mabe Limitada as Defendant (“MABE”) Counsel: Stephen Dennison Esq, QC On […]
THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE HAGUE, 11 December 2012, Case no. 200.079.897/01 “VOS SYMPATHY” Judges: M.M. Olthof, A.A. Rijperman and R. van der Vlist Dana Petroleum Netherlands B.V. v Vos Sympathy B.V. Facts and the court of first instance’s decision Dana Petroleum Netherlands B.V. (“Dana”) had entered into a contract with GB Diving […]
THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE,  EWHC 3468 (Comm), December 5, 2012 “GREATSHIP DHRITI” Judge: MRS JUSTICE GLOSTER, DBE Greatship (India) Limited v Oceanografia SA de CV This case concerns an appeal by Greatship (India) Limited (“Owners’) against a Third Partial Final Award dated 13 April 2012 of Mr. Simon Rainey QC and Dr Aleka […]
THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No 12-30230 March 1, 2013 “DEEPWATER HORIZON” Ranger Insurance Limited et al v BP et al The facts Transocean Holdings, Inc. owned the Deepwater Horizon, a semi-submersible, mobile offshore drilling unit. In April 2010, the Deepwater Horizon sank into the Gulf of Mexico after burning […]
The document that can be downloaded here contains a discussion of the 2011 judgement of the English Supreme Court on the construction of contracts under English law.
The paper that can be downloaded here contains a discussion of the judgement of the Amsterdam District Court of 1 June 2010 regarding the question if under Annex II of Marpol a ship is allowed to leave port, or is allowed to detour, with the sole intention of discharging tank into the sea cleaning water […]
The Netherlands is a jurisdiction in which it is easy to arrest ships. In the paper that can be downloaded here we discuss the arrest procedure in the Netherlands and some typical issues that can arise in the event of a ship arrest. Issues that are discussed are: Injunction proceedings to obtain the release of the vessel […]
Over the years some uncertainty has existed in the Netherlands concerning the construction of Article 3.1. and 3.4. of the Arrest Convention 1952, where it is stated: 3(1) Subject to the provisions of paragraph (4) of this Article and of Article 10, a claimant may arrest either the particular ship in respect of which the […]
In its judgement of February 1, 2008 regarding the NDS PROVIDER the Supreme Court of the Netherlands held that the purpose of the duty of care of the carrier set out in Art.III r.1 H(V)R is that a vessel should protect the cargo from the dangers of the sea, so that it is suitable to […]
Review of Nick’s Phd thesis “The System of Liability of the Hague (Visby) Rules” by Prof. D. Rhidian Thomas
Dr Nick Margetson’s Phd Thesis “The system of liability of articles III and IV of the Hague [Visby] Rules” was reviewed by Professor D. Rhidian Thomas in the Journal of International Maritime Law. Download the review here.
In its two decisions of 12 September 1997 relating to the HANJIN OAKLAND (United Kingdom Mutual Steamship Assurance Association (Bermuda) Ltd. versus Hanjin Shipping Co. Ltd, NJ 1998, 687) and the MICOPERI 7000 (United Towing Limited versus Micoperi Offshore S.p.A., NJ 1998, 688), the Supreme Court of the Netherlands (SCN) decided that under Dutch Private […]
The system of liability of articles III and IV of the Hague [Visby] Rules is Dr Nick Margetson’s Phd thesis, published in 2008. It is a comparitive law study of the application of the Hague [Visby] Rules under American, English and Dutch law, whereby Australian and Canadian law is also incidentally discussed. The purspose of […]